A Bird, Lime, Skip, and a Jump Towards E-Scooter Regulation

“It had to happen sooner or later – someone has died riding an electric scooter on a busy Fort Lauderdale road,” so began an article in the Sun-Sentinel. This exact sentiment has been echoed across the country as thousands of dockless electronic scooters (e-scooters) have been introduced into more than 100 cities worldwide. A rough count of reports from the Associated Press indicates at least 11 electronic scooter riders who have died in the U.S. since 2018. Further, an investigation by Consumer Reports found at least 1,500 e-scooter riders have been injured since e-scooters were introduced in late 2017, by the company, Bird (the most popular ride-sharing electronic scooter company). Despite safety concerns, e-scooters have become immensely popular with consumers. According to a study by the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), riders took 38.5 million trips on shared scooters in 2018

Proponents of ride-sharing e-scooters argue that:
  • They are cheap, clean, and efficient alternative methods of transportation
  • Many cities in the U.S. have inadequate public transportation systems and roadways clogged with cars
  • E-scooters offer a viable alternative means of transportation for short trips (the average e-scooter trip lasting under 20 minutes according to the NACTO)
  • They are ideal “first-last mile” solutions. Of course, many riders also simply use e-scooters because they are fun.

Opponents of ride-sharing e-scooters contend that they are dangerous to both riders and pedestrians.  Arguing that:
  • E-scooter companies do not properly train and monitor riders.
  • People frequently ride without helmets.
  • The minimum age requirement is easily circumvented by underage riders using their parent’s information.
  • Additionally, cities have been frustrated by the “act first, ask for forgiveness later” approach e-scooters companies have taken to introducing their services to cities.

Matt Watson is a second year student at the Shepard Broad College of Law and a graduate of the University of Florida. His article, A Bird, Lime, Skip, and a Jump Towards E-Scooter Regulation is forthcoming in the next issue of the Nova Law Review, Volume 44. As a child, Matt was the proud owner of a Razor scooter. He can definitely do a 360 on a scooter, you guys just weren’t watching when he landed it earlier.

Popular Posts